HackerOne users: Testing against this community violates our program's Terms of Service and will result in your bounty being denied.
Search
-
Re: Onward to 2.1b3
Regarding spam, there are some things that could be in the release, like protecting the profile by default, and making it easier to integrate anti-Spam measures. However quite a lot of it comes under the web master's responsibility. But the strategy is very much dependent on the community, and implementation. People have… -
Re: Onward to 2.1b3
I would suggest you to put ur time on most important thing and that is SPAM. Everything else is waste if ur community is attacked by spam. Google will penalize ur site too, cause spammer is bombing then to your site. There is still not a good solution for spam. If you need to read like 15 threads to just get some… -
Re: Onward to 2.1b3
@stonemonk that is a feature that you could do but it isn't really a different story, for other forums. It just transfer the spam from one list to another, it is presentational and it may be better, but you still have go the spam to check. A common solution not allow new member to post links. These kind of solutions belong… -
Re: Onward to 2.1b3
I agree with @shtefcs, spam is a serious issue. I am also affected, and considering switching from Vanilla to other software. I had to spend a lot of time looking into the anti-spam plugins (that should be included and on by default IMO). Even with these plugins and a captcha, etc, we still get a lot of spam that I must…
4 results