Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In with Facebook Sign In with Google Sign In with OpenID Sign In with Twitter

Categories

In this Discussion

Who's Online 11

CurtisOdenconnectrgarygaryleafmonsterqwentysarowlwp422 +4 guests

Dismiss announced discussion = gone forever

If I Dismiss an announced Discussion, it's just plain gone. It doesn't go back into the sequence of discussions; I can never find it again. This seems undesirable. What if I'm just trying to make it not "stuck" anymore?
«1

Comments

  • Posts: 40
    I think that's the Unannounce option, right?
  • Yeah I dismissed all the announced discussions while under the impression they would just fall into the place of normal discussions after doing so and was surprised to see they were just gone. Doesn't seem like a good result at all.
  • Posts: 2,058
    @oinkfu - No, that unannounces it for everyone. That's an admin option, not the normal "I read that now go away" option.

    Vanilla developer [GitHub, Twitter]

  • Posts: 40
    oh I see whats going on...
  • lucluc
    Posts: 1,015
    You're able to see it once it unannounced by the admin.

    That's, indeed, tricky behavior.
  • Posts: 40
    Oh that makes sense though, I rather like that.
  • Posts: 2,058
    @oinkfu You like that the thread disappears for a member between them dismissing it and the admin unannouncing it? What if, like me, you just meant to make it not be at the top of the list and now can no longer refer to it at all?

    Vanilla developer [GitHub, Twitter]

  • Posts: 40
    @Lincoln Just a personal thing, I obviously use the announcements differently. But, I would say there should be some sort of option for this feature to decide how it works on your site.
  • Posts: 2,058
    Eh, I'd rather it stayed the way it is than add an option. I try to make suggestions that I think will be less confusing, not that add complexity.

    Vanilla developer [GitHub, Twitter]

  • Posts: 40
    It's just that, for me, I hate having those sticky+closed threads appear at the top of the page all the time, so if you dismiss it, hiding it until it's un-sticky'd (or unannounced) - that makes a lot of sense to me. Obviously if it's a discussion that I'm interested in, I wouldn't dismiss it, so the system in place would work well imo.
  • Sorry I'm just testing..
  • The problem is that, if you dismiss now it is gone forever, you cant even find it with search.
  • I agree with @Lincoln. For example, if an admin posts new rules or something as an announcement, after a while of seeing the same message on the discussions page, you would most likely dismiss it. Right? So say, you forget part of a rule, and you want to remember what it said, how do you go about finding that rule again if once you dismiss a discussion it disappears forever? You don't.

    Just my thoughts on this!
  • TexTex
    Posts: 261
    @mark Why not show a "dismissed" link under Discussions if a user has dismissed some? Or a tab under the users profile.

    I had to bookmark an announcement because I wanted to know what the dismiss option does. :-(
  • Posts: 4,883
    That is a bug that I was hoping no-one would ever notice. We have to make the discussion query much more complicated if we want the behavior everyone is asking for.
  • Posts: 2,058
    I'm not advocating adding options or tabs, just simply re-inserting it into the normal flow of discussions.

    //edit: Mark replied while I was sitting here with the Discussion open. Didn't see it until after I'd typed that.

    Vanilla developer [GitHub, Twitter]

  • Posts: 2,058
    So we're down to ignoring it, mucking up the query (which I assume impacts the site speed), or mucking up the interface with a way of getting to dismissed announcements. I don't like any of the options... so I'll try to think of another.

    Vanilla developer [GitHub, Twitter]

  • Posts: 2,058
    Further complication: If you Dismiss an Announcement as the admin... you can never Unannounce it because it's gone.

    Vanilla developer [GitHub, Twitter]

  • lucluc
    Posts: 1,015
    Well, you can create another account with admin rights, and unannounce it there.

    It's cumbersome, but it should work.
  • Posts: 42
    @bean I think that may just work...
  • Posts: 42
    @lincoln, you can talk to Mark and others about it, though...
  • Posts: 2,058
    @bean That's a terrible workaround. I mean, I could just as easily edit it in phpmyadmin too, but that's a ridiculous solution for a bug.

    Vanilla developer [GitHub, Twitter]

  • lucluc
    Posts: 1,015
    Indeed, but that's better than nothing, and easier for people without mysql knowledge (I would have gone the mysql way myself).

    Something I've seen in a highly customized metaforum (it has not much left from the original metaforum, apart from the way it behaves) is that you can hide (which is basically dismiss is) lots and lots of threads (ie. discussions) but you've got a link to all those hidden threads if you care to go and watch them again.

    I'd like something like that, basically it's just what's needed, being able to dismiss any discussion (not just the announcement) and then have some link (like My bookmark/My discussion/My draft) that will displayed those specific discussions.
  • Posts: 2,058
    An interesting solution indeed! Adding a line to the Discussions dropdown menu would be worth it if I could "dismiss/ignore/hide" regular discussions I wanted gone too. Extending it like that would actually make the current behavior make sense and let people have a more enjoyable and customized experience.

    Vanilla developer [GitHub, Twitter]

  • Posts: 42
    Yesh....yesh..yesh!! Perfect'o, good one Bean. But I'm bad with Mysql and PHP coding, could you help me out? ...got it! I know do what Bean said but mkae it so when you click someones name you can't see their Dismissed Threads... Huh?!
  • Oy! I just discovered this problem — now I suddenly understand why my Announcements stopped getting replies. This is terrible behavior. Roguefoxx is right, the expected result is that they'll drop back in line; having them disappear altogether is aieee!

    The one bright spot is that an admin account can go in and Unannounce, and those dismissed threads will then show up in the list of normal discussions again. So it's not permanent. But I have to stop using the Announce feature altogether until this is fixed. :(

    I agree that Bean's suggestion might be a good solution from a user perspective, if that turns out to be easier than simply having 'dismiss' drop Announcements back into the general flow.
  • Posts: 2,058
    I've filed issue #222 regarding this problem on GitHub.

    Vanilla developer [GitHub, Twitter]

  • lucluc
    Posts: 1,015
    Thanks Lincoln, thanks to you, we know how to create a search element :): #vanilla2
  • Posts: 2,058
    Haha, yeah I noticed that too. For not tweeting much, @Mark sure is taking pages from their playbook! ;)

    Vanilla developer [GitHub, Twitter]

  • Posts: 4,883
    hahaha - I forgot I added that functionality!
Sign In or Register to comment.